top of page
Search

SPF 30 vs SPF 50 – what does it actually mean?

  • Writer: Dr Brad
    Dr Brad
  • 1 day ago
  • 2 min read

In the previous posts I discussed the CHOICE sunscreen testing and how differences in testing and manufacturing may have contributed to the results.

The next practical question is what those numbers actually mean for everyday use.


Sunscreens that performed best in the testing

Sunscreen

Claimed SPF

Tested SPF

Type

La Roche-Posay Anthelios Wet Skin

50+

~72

Chemical

Neutrogena Ultra Sheer Body Lotion

50

~56

Chemical

Cancer Council Kids Sunscreen

50+

~52

Chemical

Mecca Cosmetica To Save Body

50+

~51

Chemical

*Invisible Zinc Face + Body Mineral

50

~38

Mineral

*best performing Zinc sunscreen

 

Most other products still provided useful protection but often tested closer to the SPF 20–40 range.

What SPF actually measures

 

SPF measures protection against UVB radiation, the part of sunlight that causes sunburn.

It compares how much UV exposure causes redness on protected skin compared with unprotected skin.

Another way to understand SPF is the percentage of UVB radiation blocked.

SPF

Approx UVB blocked

 

SPF 15

93%

 

SPF 30

97%

 

SPF 50

98%

 

 


Does SPF 50 mean you can stay in the sun longer?

In laboratory testing SPF is based on time to sunburn.

For example, if someone normally burns after 5 minutes without sunscreen:

SPF

Theoretical burn time

SPF 30

~150 minutes

SPF 50

~250 minutes

However, this assumes sunscreen is applied very thickly (2 mg/cm²).

In everyday use people usually apply less than half this amount, and sweating, swimming and missed areas reduce protection.

For this reason, sunscreen should still be reapplied every two hours regardless of SPF rating.


The practical difference between SPF 30 and SPF 50 is therefore modest but helpful, providing a slightly larger margin if sunscreen is applied thinly or unevenly.


What if a sunscreen performs below SPF 30?

The sunscreen will still give protection however, the margin for error becomes smaller, especially in a high-UV environment like Australia.

For this reason, most guidelines recommend SPF 30+ or higher.

 

 

 Simple takeaway

  • SPF 30+ would be the minimum I would use

  • SPF 50 gives an additional margin of safety

  • application thickness matters

    • one teaspoon per limb, front and back of the body

    • half a teaspoon for the face, neck and back of ears

  • reapplication matters

    • reapply every 2 hours unless stated otherwise

  • chemical sunscreens performed the best in the choice study

 


In the next post, I’ll look at the differences between mineral and chemical sunscreens, and also discuss how sunscreen ingredients are assessed for safety.

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
The CHOICE Sunscreen Test – What Happened?

Last year there were headlines about sunscreen testing in Australia. People who care about their skin and skin cancer prevention were understandably interested in what it meant, so I thought it was wo

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page